Facts and Realities of 1971 Bangla Desh War Part 2
Facts and Realities of 1971 Bangla Desh War Part 2:
In this part of program Dr Pirzada with the help of facts and research explained that how Israel was helping India during 1971 war. In fact they started training Indians and provided military support to them long time before the actual war in 1971. It was explained in detail that it was not Pakistani military responsible for genocide of Bengalis but it was Indian forces and Mukti Bahini that actually committed genocide in Bangladesh.
Facts and Realities of 1971 Bangla Desh War Part 1
Facts and Realities of 1971 Bangla Desh War Part 1:
Dr Moeed pirzada in an exclusive segment of his program described in detail the facts about 1971 war that ended up in fall of Dhaka. He expressed that selection of date for an attack on APS School on 16th December 2014 clearly gives the signal that there is same mastermind behind the attack and fall of Dhaka. Dr Moeed described with references that India was the mastermind and main culprit behind fall of Dhaka and 1971 war. All the record of the war was eliminated that included how mukti bahani militant group was formed by Indian army and the record of camps where they were getting training. It was also discussed with the reference of books and articles that Bangladesh PM sheikh Mujeeb rehman established links with Indian government since 1962 through secret mails. Also it was discussed that Mukti bahini was responsible for massive killings of Bengalis and rape of women during and after 1971 war. India falsely accused that Pakistani army was behind killings and rapes. Indian side always exaggerated number of Pakistani soldiers during the war, authentic facts and figures show that only 34,000 soldiers were participating in the war and even they were restricted to the border areas.
Face to Face: An Exclusive Interview of Foreign Minister Mr. Sartaj Aziz With Dr. Moeed Pirzada
Exclusive Interview of Foreign Minister Mr. Sartaj Aziz With Dr. Moeed Pirzada. The interview was held just after Sartaj Aziz visit to US to discuss US Pakistan new strategic dialogues round. Pakistan relations with US , India and Afghanistan were discussed with Sartaj Aziz in this program. Sartaj Aziz said that on ministerial level our strategic dialogues started in 2010 but the process derailed after three important events including case of Raymond davis, OBL operation and Salala base accident. Dr Pirzada asked him about the basis of Pak US strategic dialogues. He replied that basis of positive relationship is not fully decided yet as we were given small strategic role during Soviet’s invasion in Afghanistan and we signed seato and cento pacts. He said that we are also curious to protect our interests while maintaining these strategic dialogues. His book named “Between dreams and realities” was also discussed during interview. He expressed need for Pakistan to become strong hold of progressive and modern Islam that will increase country’s importance as well. He accepted that whenever west needed us there was an ouster in the power. Like Ayub khan, Ziaul haq and then Pervez musharraf. And one of the reason why US had issues with Nawaz government in 1999 was nuclear tests as he became threat for them to appear as an independent leader. So they wanted to change him and obviously some domestic factors were also involved in it.
An Exclusive Interview Ishaq Dar with Dr. Moeed Pirzada
An exclusive discussion with Foreign minister Ishaq Dar, who is not only a minister but close relative of PM Nawaz Sharif and because of this he is completely aware of PM’s vision and its implementation for economy of Pakistan. Interview was conducted just after quarterly briefing on 1st January 2014 given to PM Nawaz by Finance minister Ishaq Dar on quarterly performance of his ministry. Ishaq dar defended his government’s position that tax revenue and remittances were increased in past few months. He also said that his government balanced the circular debt already present in the system and industrial growth and power generation increased. He said in his interview that only few pseudo intellectuals were running campaign to spread the rumors that Pakistani currency will be highly devalued. He said that his government should be given credit to increase value of Pakistani rupees from 110 rupees / dollar to bring it up to 105 rupees/ dollar.
Fall of Dacca, 1971 – When did India decided to create ‘Bangladesh’: 1971 or 1963?
Indira Gandhi, always defended her decision to attack former East-Pakistan and to create ‘Bangladesh’ in 1971, as a decision she took after the Pakistani Military action against Bengali rebels, ie after the Operation Search Light in March 1971. Off-course she was lying. A large guerrilla force of more than 100,000 could not be trained, mobilized and put into operation against a professional army in few weeks. But given Pakistan’s defeat, its rule by a Military govt, its international isolation, its sense of shock and humiliation and plain incompetence Indira was able to sell this simplistic narrative to the world and even to common citizens in India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. But the more historians dig into the past the more they discover her lies. For instance an Ex-Indian Dipolmat, Sushanka S Bannerjee, published his book, “India, Mujibur Rehman, Banglaesh Liberation & Pakistan” from London in 2011. Book is full of his hate commentaries against Pakistan, Pakistan Army, Punjabis, China and the US administration of Nixon and Kissinger. But book is goldmine in one respect: it gives details of an interesting meeting that takes place on 25th December 1962 in Dacca, then capitol of former East Pakistan. S. Bannerjee describes how Manik Mian, also known in Bengal’s history as ‘Tuffuzal Hussain’ Editor of then popular Bengali paper, Ittefaq, organizes his first meeting with Sheikh Mujeeb ur Rehman, leader of Awami League and how Sheikh in that meeting hands over a secret letter for Indian PM, Pundit Jawaharlal Nehru. Letter was sent, in tripple coded cypher message, by Col. S Ghosh, Station Commander of Indian Intelligence Bureau (IB) in Dacca to the office of Indian PM. In addition to the PM, it was for the notice of Indian Foreign Secretary and Director IB. In the letter Sheikh Mujeeb ur Rehman demanded Indian help for setting up a ‘Bangladesh govt in exile’ from London; he wanted to launch his movement from March 1963 against the central govt of Pakistan – a movement for the liberation of Bengladesh. But PM Nehru in his well considered reply, after several weeks advises against the plan to shift it to London. He promises all out Indian help but advises Sheikh that his party (Awami League) has to turn itself into a mass movement of small towns and villages like Gandhi’s struggle against British; it has to become a ‘donation seeking party’ whose members carry cards for deeper penetration and it has to hold rallies all across the rural hinterland. Nehru advises Sheikh that only becoming such a mass movement will he attract international support and he promises all help towards that end. He warns Sheikh that in 1963 international climate is not favourable for this rebellion but time will come to strike. This tv segment (in Urdu) describes this plan and raises interesting questions. Who then was planning to create a mass unrest, a civil war and chaotic law and order situation? Who was waiting to create a situation to intervene militarily?
Fall of Dacca, 1971- Why India’s Eastern… by moeedpirzada2015
Fall of Dacca, 1971- Why India’s Eastern Command destroyed all records related to War & Creation…
Times of India story of May 2010 describes that Indian Army’s Eastern Command had destroyed all records related to the creation of Bengali Guerrilla Force called Mukti Bahni. These records of Eastern Command at Kolkata were ‘shredded’ immediately after the war on the orders of Gen. Jaggit Singh Arora, Head of the Eastern Command. Records would have explained when was ‘Mukti Bahni’ first conceived and then created; where was it trained and when training started? and who were giving instructions to it and what were those instructions? Though most Indian historians admit that ‘Mukti Bahni’ was Indian Army’s ‘baby’ as ‘RK Yadav’ recently admitted. But still all these details assume great significance since historians studying the 1971 war and its ‘genocide’ are now getting convinced that most killings were done by ‘Mukti Bahni’ , so who was giving them instructions and what was the purpose of these relentless killings of Behari, West Pakistani families and Bengalis who were against rebellion? Answer to this question is fundamental to the understanding of the nature of war in 1971 and its allegations of ‘genocide’. This tv segment will help raise this understanding.
